So everyone and their dog seems to be lapping
up John Wick: Chapter 2 when it came out.
Believe the hype! The best action movie of
the century! etc etc…
But I, for one, didn't think it was all that great. In
fact, I ended up feeling pretty bored for a large portion of the movie. It was adequate,
I guess – not a terrible film by any stretch, but I thought I would try and
explain why I felt so underwhelmed.
Firstly: a lack of stakes. Despite taking his
fair share of knocks during the film, it seems John Wick is never really in any
danger - even more so since he now sports a bulletproof suit (with which you
see him occasionally use as a shield in some sort of hilarious Dracula
impression). Enemies seem to just run into his line of fire, or wait patiently
for their turn to engage him in hand to hand combat. Rarely does he meet
someone who gives him a decent challenge, the only person coming close is
Common’s character Cassian, who ends up being dispatched long before the climax
of the movie.
Secondly: a lack of motivation. The first John Wick film worked so well because the
premise was so straightforward: A guy is wronged (his dog killed and his car stolen) and
so spends the majority of the film enacting his revenge. It’s simple and
effective. Chapter 2? Not so much. It
goes more like this: someone asks him to do something for him, he refuses
despite not asking what that particular thing is and knowing full well what the
consequences of breaking said oath might be. So the guy makes good on his
promise, blows up his house, John Wick agrees to work for him anyway(!?), does
what the man asks him to do, ends up being betrayed anyway (obviously!), then spends
most of the rest of the movie killing everyone else who is now trying to kill
him.
It’s needlessly daft and convoluted, most of it
barely making sense when examined even in a cursory fashion. Why not go straight
after the guy who blew his house up? (It would have been more in line with his
mode of operation in the first movie). Why can’t he just disappear after he
survives his house explosion (as he clearly wants out of the life of a killer
and is now presumed dead)? Why does Lawrence Fishburne only give him 7 bullets (not
that helpful) when clearly he has already made up his mind to help him and
would benefit from him surviving in order to wipe out the competition and to owe him future favours? Why is Ruby Rose
built up to be this awesome badass and yet we never see her fight anyone until
the very end of the film (her fight with John Wick ends up being a disappointingly
brief affair).
It seems that the film is constantly putting
style ahead of sense, with many ‘oh wouldn't this be cool if...?’ moments instead of
any real substance.
I’m not usually one to decry senseless violence
(I have absolutely no problem with violence in movies, games, comics and what
have you given it's given the right context), but it’s kind of worrying how a film in which you see a hundredth
nameless bad guy get judo thrown and then shot in the head is still getting rave
reviews all over the shop. I appreciate that there is too much in the way of
watered down ‘action’ movies in recent times (as a lower rating means wider
audience at the box office), but just because something is refreshingly violent
doesn't mean it should be automatically considered good. There’s just not enough decent story or
motivation behind it all. Besides, with the likes of Deadpool and Logan being
critically and commercially successful, it seems a new wave of R-rated action
films could be just around the corner.
Just to re-iterate: I actually didn't mind the
first John Wick film. It seems the
second is trying to ape parts of it, without really understanding what made it
work. For example: he has a dog in this one too, but only in a handful of
scenes, and it spends most of the time being ‘looked after’ off-screen by
another character. John Wick also goes to rescue his car (using another car
that looks pretty similar in the opening of the film) but then proceeds to
smash up said car in the process. The subtitles tailored for idiots also make an
unwelcome return: (‘We MUST
highlight random words, and have
them floating around different parts
of the screen, so the audience doesn't GET bored with READing them’), is all I can think of when I see them.
Even rent-a-baddie Peter Stormare collects an
easy cheque in a cameo role that loosely ties back to events in the first film.
Again, it seems he is just there to remind the audience of how ‘legendary’ the
reputation of John Wick is and how he has been given the nickname of ‘Baba
Yaga’ or ‘The Boogeyman’ because he is so frightening. And yet we never see
anyone actually being frightened of him.
EVER. Of the hundreds of cannon fodder enemies that rush him, not a single one
ever hesitates for even a second.
For all the talk of “oh – but this one expands
on the mythos of the world of assassins so much more!”, there is precious
little that is actually brought to light. In fact, so many more questions are
raised instead. What is the significance of the coins exactly? Do all hits get paid
in them? Why does a bulletproof suit cost a similar amount in coins as a single
drink at the bar of the Continental? What benefit does Lawrence Fishburne have
for disguising himself as a homeless man? Why does Winston have a soft spot for
John Wick and bends the rules for him when he is so absolute with everyone else
(note Perkin’s death in the first film)? Who runs the hitman agency that
everyone is supposedly a part of and why do they use oldschool wire
switchboards and exclusively employ hipster chicks?
I have a nagging suspicion that much of this
will just be answered by: ‘cos that’s friggin’ cool right?’, and be left at
that.
I hate being so negative about any film - but I
feel I need to redress the balance and express my surprise at how much praise
this film has been getting. And to be fair the film did have a few good moments
(seeing John Wick finally dispatch some goons with a pencil, the confrontation
with Gianna, the extended tussle with Cassian, Peter Serafinowicz!)…. We need
more of these kind of scenes – there is only so much shooting yet another
nameless henchman in the head you can take before it starts to get mind-numbingly
repetitive.
Props to Keanu though, he is over 50 now and
his stunt work and physical dedication in this is incredible. Although he has
seemed to fully embrace the character, I can’t help but feel he was given the opportunity to show
a lot more range and emotion in the first film.
So I didn’t hate John Wick: Chapter 2, but didn't like it all that much either. It’s
a case of too much style without the substance to match. Shouldn't we be demanding more in
terms of character, meaningful action, motivation and story to go along with it all?
10th March 2017
You make many valid points here. I also felt there was a lull between Wick's house being blown to pieces and when he is trying to escape the grounds his hit is meant to take place at in Rome. A good 25-30 minute portion of the film that was mainly chatter and Wick tooling up. It was too much downtime for me.
ReplyDeleteMaybe the director/producers will rectify this for the third film but I get the vibe they will push what you didn't enjoy here even further (so more graphic novel-style assassins for John Wick to murder in imaginative ways).